MMRCA aircraft even if it is F-16 will not have much affect on IAF since main chunk of MMRCA plane will be based mostly in North East and Forward bases of Jap Sector (Kolkata) which can even have MKI. Recent Articles and air force officers have made it clear that MMRCA winner shall be based in Jap sector , different plane’s like Tejas ,Mig-29,M2k ,MKI will defend Western SectorQuite appropriate. To be trustworthy, ToT, avionics and what not apart, efficiency of the plane is crucial IMO if it will have to operate along aspect the MKI on occasions, particularly in that exact space. When you consider it, its self-explanatory why the IAF sent up its MKI’s against the RAF’s Typhoon’s on, IIRC two events? Once within the UK and again in India a short while ago and never solely would it not have been a “vs” contest, its secure to say that they would’ve labored collectively too against the likes of the Tornados, Harriers, Mirages, Migs and many others.
The NG would be the most trendy and state-of-the-artwork of all of the fighters in the MMRCA. Typhoon and Rafale are both older than the NG which is being developed as we converse. Kinematically it would compete with any of the others, pulling 10g without breaking a sweat. The present Gripen has a very low RCS, the NG may have additional RCS reduction. You do know that the current Gripen has radars blockers in air intakes, in addition the engine just isn’t seen through intakes. The radar radome consists of RAM material that solely lets the radar frequencies by. etc, and many others.
Which is completely flawed and I actually do not understand why Gripen supporters at all times say this? It is better on some points, agreed, but mainly on particular techs, or weapons. In any respect basic specs LCA MK2 might be very near Gripen NG, which is even logical, because they have so many similarities in design. As for the LCA programme I have supported it always and I’ve no must criticise it, IMO IAF should have ordered more LCA even if it is much less capable as a result of its our personal fighter. However what I would not have is blind nationalism projecting it as on par with more successful designs like the Gripen whereas it has not proved something.
furthermore the exact statement you had been replying to was about numbers of LCA vs numbers of MRCA in IAF, not whether it was LCA Mk1 or Mk2. The LCA did not meet all of the IAF requirements in its present kind. Even for the IOC IAF made certain concessions (Based on ACM Naik). The truth is that if the MK1 was ok there can be no need for an MK2. The UK’s Secretary of State for Defence Liam Fox visited the Eurofighter Storm Workplace in New Delhi on the 23rd November, assembly a gaggle of excessive-level firm officers throughout his keep. Bernhard Gerwert, CEO of Cassidian Air Programs and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Eurofighter GmbH, briefed Liam Fox on the present status of the Eurofighter Typhoon campaign to win India’s tender for 126 Medium Multi-Function Combat Plane (MMRCA).
Personally I believe at least four (and probably additionally F-16) meet all technical necessities. One reason why I consider additionally the NG does is that the businesses have stated that they’ve acquired plenty of suggestions from the IAF on how they have scored on the tests – couple that with the fact that Saab is on Aereo India in drive and has additionally introduced opening of a Saab R&D centre in India, it appears clear that Saab has been advised that the NG did score very well on the checks – otherwise they might not waste so much money and time on this competition.